Dakotas Christian Believers Arena
Come on in and browse 
   Home      Apologetics 5


Apologetics – 5

Introduction:

This is the 5th installment of our series on apologetics and presenting Drs. Phillips & Cherian’s views on the issue. if you want their complete views please look up their books and read them.
 
Analyzing Errors Of Interpretation
 
Errors Of Interpretation
 

To anyone experienced in Christian Apologetics or Polemics, it is obvious that a large

proportion of the questions and problems raised against the Bible stem from improper

interpretation.
 

Interpretation is a normal part of human life. Without a sufficiently accurate

interpretation of what our family, friends, teachers, or the media say, no one can

survive for long. But the very fact that we communicate well with all these people, and

they with us, shows that we are following common rules of interpretation in our lives.

The same principles apply to the Bible also, but many times people overlook these

principles. This might be accidental or deliberate, but the result is that a lot of questions

are unnecessarily and unfairly raised against the Bible.
 

In the case of the Bible, the common rules of interpretation are supplemented with

additional rules derived from the Bible and theology. This makes misinterpretation of the

Bible even more difficult, yet errors continue to plague Bible interpretation. This

surprises many. On the other hand, some are not even aware that errors of

interpretation exist. All this is because many are ignorant not only about Hermeneutics,

but also about the probable causes of interpretive errors.
 

In this chapter we will look at common causes that give rise to errors of interpretation.

Though there are hundreds of types of errors of interpretation, they can be grouped into

a few general categories. These are:
 

1-Errors Related To Prejudices And Biases

2-Errors Related To Meaning And Perception

3-Errors Related To Collection And Integration
 

We will discuss each one of them in detail, and will illustrate some of the varieties of

errors in each group.
 
 
Errors Related To Prejudices And Biases
 

No human is all-knowing. In fact man's knowledge is very limited. Therefore, he cannot

interpret accurately in areas for which he does not have sufficient background

information. Further, almost every person has some prejudices and biases. When all

these work together, the result is errors resulting from prejudices and biases.
 

The errors of prejudices and biases are compounded because of a number of reasons.

First, many who interpret the Bible are not born again. This is because more and more

unsaved people are occupying positions as Pastors, Teachers, and even Seminary

professors. Recently I read the story of a person who was employed with the American

Bible Society for almost three decades. He was a translation consultant, a job involving

transmission of the Bible into numerous languages. What was shocking that this man

was a "freethinker", which is another name for an atheist !
 

When people like that occupy positions of authority in spiritual world, distortion of

interpretation is inevitable. Further, even among believers the number of superficial

people has been increasing. Instead of holding on to the fundamentals of the Christian

faith like Sola Scriptura (Bible Alone), Sola Fide (Faith Alone), Sola Gratia (Grace Alone),

and Solus Christus (Christ Alone), they are people who have compromised with one or

more of these doctrines. Consequently, their interpretations now correspond to their

biases. All these biases show in many ways and some of them are:
 

BASIC HUMAN TENDENCY IS TO DISTORT: The basic human tendency is to distort

the word of God, that is true even among believers. This is due to the ever-present

influence of the world, the flesh, and the devil. When God revealed His future plans to

Joseph even his parents found it difficult to believe. Furious with the message, his

brethren went one step further and even tried to nullify what God had predicted. The

same is our tendency today, specially in matters that we do not like. We prefer to distort

and oppose God's message if it does not suit our biases, prejudices, and tastes.
 

When the Sadduccees approached Jesus with a seemingly difficult problem, Jesus replied

in Matthew 22:29 "Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God". The

Sadduccees were the rationalists of their time, and thus they were biased against God

and Revelation. Consequently they misinterpreted the Bible due to their bias. Peter says

the same thing when in 2 Peter 3:16 he says about Pauline Epistles, "As also in all [his]

epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be

understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as [they do] also the

other scriptures, unto their own destruction". It must be noticed that though some

things in the Scriptures are hard to understand, the distortion is not because of this

difficulty, but rather because these people are unstable and away from divine wisdom.
 

The only solution is to go back to sound hermeneutics, with full dependence upon the

Holy Spirit, and without even an iota of human ideas.
 

BASIC HUMAN TENDENCY IS TO DISBELIEVE: Divine Revelation is totally at

variance with human thinking. This is one reason why the invitation for receiving

Salvation through the simple act of belief is rejected by many. Like Namaan, they would

be happy to cross seven seas for getting a reward, but when the same thing is offered

as a gift they are not ready to believe it. Most of them are not even willing to give it a

try.
 

When God told Abraham and Sarai that they would have a child of their own, they

disbelieved God -- even after hearing Him face to face. When an angel of the Lord spoke

to Zachariah, he did not believe though what he witnessed was a miracle. When the rich

man asked Abraham to send Lazarus to his brethren so that this resurrection might

convict them, Abraham replied that if they do not believe the word of God, they would

not believe anything. In other words, the basic disbelief in the heart of people forces

them to ignore the message of God. The result is only distortion when they express their

views about this message.
 

BASIC HUMAN TENDENCY OF REBELLION: The unbeliever lives a life of continuous

rebellion against God, because he is controlled by his flesh. But even after salvation,

many people spend greater amount of time under the flesh rather than under the

control of the Spirit. Consequently, even such believers manifest the same basic

rebellion that is seen in the lives of unbelievers.
 

Since the flesh (sin nature) rebels against God, the reproof and instruction of the word

of God are not very pleasing to them. Consequently these people try to distort the

Scriptures. Jonah is a good example. As a Jew he was horrified when God asked him to

preach the gospel to Assyrians who were the most degenerate enemies of Jews at that

time. This rebellion forced him to question God's will and commands repeatedly. The

same thing can be seen when rebellious believers interpret the Bible.
 

A GOOD NUMBER OF PEOPLE LACK THEOLOGICAL OR BIBLICAL BACKGROUND:

The message of the Bible is vastly different from the best human wisdom. It is also at

total variance from the greatest man-made religious treatises. Consequently, a certain

minimum Biblical background is essential for perceiving the truth of the message of the

Bible.
 

When a person approaches the Bible from his own human background, many divine

pronouncements look like a big joke to them. In Genesis 19 we notice the history of

Sodom and Gomorrah's destruction. Lot's daughters were married to men of Sodom.
 

These men had already seen the way in which the Lord blinded the wicked men of

Sodom. It was after all this that "And Lot went out, and spake unto his sons in law,

which married his daughters, and said, Up, get you out of this place; for the LORD will

destroy this city. But he seemed as one that mocked unto his sons in law" (Verse 14).

Obviously, to the depraved mind of people of Sodom, the divine plan looked like a big

joke, and they just laughed it away. The word of God was challenged, mocked, and

rejected due to their human background.
 

A GOOD NUMBER OF PEOPLE LACK SPIRITUAL MATURITY: Just as a certain

amount of mental maturity is essential before a person can understand many of the

human activities, a certain minimum amount of spiritual maturity is essential before a

person can understand the Word of God.
 

In the Bible there is a whole range of doctrines, ranging from the simple milk to the solid

meat. Many of the more serious doctrines cannot be understood without a certain basic

minimum amount of maturity. That is why Paul says in Hebrews 5:11 that "Of whom we

have many things to say, and hard to be uttered, seeing ye are dull of hearing".

Obviously, when a believer dull of hearing tries to understand (or tries to teach) these

tougher doctrines, he is bound to present it according to his simplistic understanding.

The result would be a distortion of doctrine.
 

INFLUENCE OF PHILOSOPHIES: Almost none of us likes to abandon our philosophical

biases. When such philosophies become very strong, they distort Bible interpretations.

Thus there are many who interpret the Bible in the light of Feminism, Syncretism,

Pluralism, Radicalism, Evolutionism, Humanism, Rationalism, etc.
 

The Feminist is able to see only masculine bias and prejudice in the Bible. The Syncretist

and the Pluralist sees only a one-world religion in the Bible. The Evolutionist is quick to

see a "gap" in Genesis. Alternately, he is able to see Genesis 1-10 only as poetry,

though it is written in straight Hebrew prose. The end result of all kinds of philosophical

prejudice is error.
 

In essence, though the Bible is often very clear about its statements, people

misinterpret it because of their prejudices and biases. These prejudices and biases are

created by their basic human tendencies to distort, disbelieve, rebellion, lack of biblical

background, and lack of spiritual maturity.
 

The solution is not to heed to their distortions, but to show where they have erred. In

addition, the whole counsel of the Word of God should be declared to them. The Bible

itself is the best defense and offense against distortion, because according to Hebrews

4:12 "the word of God [is] quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword,

piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow,

and [is] a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart".
 

IMBALANCE BETWEEN CAUSE/COMMITMENT: Bible mentions many causes and

expects believers to demonstrate an appropriate commitment to it. For example, the

cause of orphans, widows, and strangers is mentioned repeatedly in the Law. The

Israelites were expected to manifest commitment appropriate to this cause. In the same

way causes ranging from care of the helpless believer, to guarding one's purity are

commanded in the Bible.
 

Obviously, not all causes are of equal priority, and consequently not all commitments

are of the same priority. Some causes and commitment to them are placed on the

highest level, while others are ranked lower. The believer is expected to understand the

relative importance of the cause and exhibit a commitment proportional to it. Depending

upon a person's perception, four different kinds of situations can arise, as shown

below:
 

Low Cause, Low Commitment

High Cause, High Commitment

Low Cause, High Commitment

High Cause, Low Commitment
 

In the first two cases the level of the cause and commitment match, and that is how it

ought to be. In the last two cases there is a mismatch between the level of the cause

and that of the commitment. People with such misplaced sense of value are bound to

misinterpret the Bible to fit in with their preconceived views, and the result would be

error.
 

For example, a person who places high priority on the externals might be more

concerned about passages dealing with clothing, facial expression, hairstyles, and food

while he ignores Biblical statements related to purity of heart and life. The result would

be an imbalanced interpretation and erroneous theology.
 
Errors Related To Meaning And Perception
 

The meaning of a statement has two parts: the absolute meaning, and the contextual

meaning. The absolute meaning is determined with the help of vocabulary and

grammar, while the contextual meaning is obtained by considering the historical,

sociological, and cultural, and the textual context.
 

Without having both the meanings at hand it is often difficult to understand the precise

message of the Bible. For example, in Songs of Solomon, the shepherd addresses his

beloved as his "sister". While a dictionary is sufficient to find out the meaning of this

word, it does not make any sense to the modern reader. Once the contexts mentioned

above are considered it becomes clear that the word "Sister" had many usages for them.

One of them was a term of endearment used for one's wife.
 

Thus if the meaning of the passage is not perceived properly, it can lead to many types

of errors. Some of these are:
 

IGNORANCE ABOUT THE NATURE OF A PASSAGE: The nature of a statement plays

an important role in interpreting and applying its meaning. Statements can be of many

types such as Concrete/Abstract, General/Specific, Affirmation/Negative, etc. Thus what

is specific would create problems if interpreted as general, and what is negative would

create problems if it is interpreted as affirmation.
 

Many statements about Israel and the Church are specific to these groups. If they are

generalized to include other groups also, the result would be catastrophic.
 

RIGHT AND WRONG KEYS: There are many keys to understand the message of a

particular passage. Thus, God's dealings with Israel can be explained only if several

factors governing the choice of Israel are taken into considerations. Thus these factors

are the right key to understand those passages, and any other factors would act only as

wrong keys.
 

Similarly, when passages related only to the Church are applied to Israel, or passages

related only to Israel are applied to the Church, errors are bound to arise. A study of

dispensations also makes it clear that the correct key is essential to understand a given

passage correctly. When that is not done, or when the wrong key is used, errors are

bound to arise.
 

HUMAN LIMITATIONS: The Bible is a communication from the infinite God to the finite

man. Consequently, some difficulties of perception and understanding are bound to

occur on man's side. This difficulty is compounded by many other factors that add to our

limitations of perception.
 

Depending upon our upbringing and training, each one of us has our blind spots, logical,

perceptional, linguistic, comprehensional, and doctrinal limitations. Consider the

example of multiple reports of the same event, as often recorded in the four gospels.
 

A person who is exposed to newspapers knows that faithful multiple reports of the same

event cannot often be reconciled with each other. This is not because of problems with

reporting, but due to problems of integration. Similar limitations force a lot of people to

misinterpret the Bible, though others find no serious problem with the same passages.
 

Doctrines related to divine discipline, and the command to pray (even though God

already knows all that we need), can often be understood only after one lives as a loving

and concerned father or mother for several years. A bachelor cannot usually get the

same depth of perception into these things.
 

Further, many people attempt to explain or understand more than that which is actually

possible for the finite man. Thus all such attempts by the finite intelligence are bound to

face problems, and often the solution that is offered would be an erroneous

interpretation.
 

MULTIPLE MEANINGS: Many words have multiple meanings, and only the context

makes the precise meaning clear. Many people, unfortunately, are in the habit of

interpreting a statement only in the light of the predominant meaning of a given word.

Thus when they hear about Salvation, Justification, or Filling of the Spirit, they force an

interpretation upon the passage.
 

Salvation is used in several ways in the Bible. It might refer to salvation from the

condemnation of sin, but it might also refer to experiential sanctification. Only the

context makes the meaning clear, and unless this is done, careless interpretation of

words with multiple meanings can give rise to errors.
 

INABILITY TO PERCEIVE DIVINE ACTIONS: When the finite man looks at the

actions of the divine, he is perplexed by many things. For example, he feels that for

similar actions God punishes different individuals differently. One individual speaks a lie,

and he is dead. Another one commits adultery and murder, yet is let off without any

seeming punishment. On encountering these kinds of problems people are quick to

judge that God is unfair.
 

What most such people overlook is the fact that man is able to see only certain

immediately visible actions, whereas God is able to see the past, present, and future. He

is also cognizant of what has been, and will be, passing through the heart of the

individuals involved. No finite human can understand such things. Thus in haste they

come to conclusions and deductions that are erroneous.
 

THE MYSTERY CHARACTERISTICS OF DOCTRINES: Many Bible doctrines are totally

different from everyday human thinking. This difference becomes pronounced in the

New Testament period. For example man thinks of salvation through works whereas

Bible speaks of salvation as an unmerited gift.
 

Many of the New Testament doctrines were kept as mysteries even at the time of Jesus'

earthly ministry. A clear revelation on these subjects has come only after Pentecost.

Further, only a believer filled with the spirit, having a transformed mind (Rom. 12:1-2)

can understand many of these subjects. They are a mystery for outsiders, and even the

insiders need the right frame of mind to understand these things. Thus if anyone

(specially an unregenerate or uncommitted person) tries to understand these doctrines,

the result would be only error.
 

LINGUISTIC LIMITATIONS: Human languages are very powerful and flexible. Yet

they are quite limited when describing the person and work of God. Thus when a human

tries to probe the inner details of certain information in the Bible, he might find it very

difficult to comprehend or express those ideas.
 

When the words "son", "generation" and "proceeds" are used for Jesus Christ, and when

the word "flesh" is used for the old sin nature, difficulties are bound to arise due to

linguistic limitations.
 

Further, many human words such as "repent" are used in connection with the divine. At

the same time, these words might have connotations that are not applicable to the

divine. The interpreted must clearly distinguish the meanings which are applicable, and

which are not, when a certain term is used to describe the divine. No words are

sufficient to describe God and His actions totally or accurately, and errors are bound to

arise if this is not kept in mind.
 
Errors Related To Collection And Integration
 

The Bible is a massive book, and it discusses numerous subjects. However, the

discussion on a given subject are not all in one place. Often the information is scattered

all over the Bible. Further, these discussions of the same subject are often presented in

different contexts, cultures, and even in different idioms. Thus the Bible cannot be

treated like a textbook or encyclopedia which is divided into various subjects.
 

Since information related to the same subject is scattered so widely, an interpreter has

to collect all this information, sift them, then arrange them, and then deduce the correct

information. This is a difficult task, and many interpreters are not willing to take pains

sufficient for doing a proper job. The result is often an incomplete picture or a skewed

interpretation.
 
Some errors related to collection and interpretation of information are as follows:
 

IGNORING SOME AND EMPHASIZING OTHER PORTIONS: Almost everyone has his

own biases and pet philosophies, and it affects the way they interpret a given passage.

In addition, these biases and pet theories force some people to totally disregard those

passages that go against their biases. On the other hand, they gladly pick up and harp

upon those verses that seem to go along with their biases. This distorts the process of

collection and interpretation, and the net result is error.
 

Another trick used by proponents of pet philosophies is to take all verses into

consideration, but to interpret statements unfavorable to them in such a way as to

conform to their pet theories. A good example would be the teaching on Limited

Atonement. According to this philosophy, Christ died only for the church. When

numerous statements related to Christ's death for the whole world are brought to their

attention, they insist that these verses should be interpreted according to their

philosophy. The same is the method used for arguing that some people are fixed by God

for salvation, and others are fixed by God for damnation into hell fire.
 

Error is introduced when a person insists that statements in the Bible should be

interpreted in the light of certain extrabiblical philosophies. The correct procedure would

be to compare scripture with scripture and come to right deductions. All philosophies

should then be evaluated in the light of these biblical deductions, and not the other way

round.
 

PROGRESSIVE NATURE OF REVELATION: Though we now have the complete Bible

in our hands, this was not always the situation. Biblical revelation started being written

down in parts in the Old Testament era. The New Testament makes it very clear that

such revelation was progressive in nature, and it came to a completion only with the

incarnation of Jesus and the arrival of the Church age.
 

Consequently, many doctrines which have found full expression in the New Testament

were either veiled, or were known only partially in the Old Testament. This progressive

nature of revelation requires that a given doctrinal passage be interpreted only in the

light of revelation available up to that time. When this is not done, errors are bound to

arise.
 

PROGRESSIVE NATURE OF HUMAN PERCEPTION: Revelation from God was

progressive, and the fullness came only in the New Testament. Thus many of the Bible

doctrines were not clearly or fully known in the Old Testament. Though the progressive

revelation has now come to its final form, our understanding of doctrine continues to be

progressive.
 

A look at the history of Christian doctrine would immediately reveal that the first four to

five centuries were periods when a large number of heretical teachers rose up and many

of them confused the Christians because the understanding of doctrine was at a

primitive level. However, starting from this period, and continuing through Protestant

Reformation, our understanding of doctrine has progressively been increasing. However,

our perception and understanding would never be complete in this life. Consequently,

there will always be some errors of interpretation.
 

These errors are compounded in the case of people who try to interpret doctrinal

passages without first studying the understanding that has been gained during all these

years. This is why this the history of Christian doctrine, (Historical Theology), is taught

as an essential subject in many evangelical theological seminaries.
 

THE SUFFICIENT/TOTAL DISTINCTION: God's revelation is "sufficient" for doctrine,

reproof, correction, and for instruction in righteousness. However, it is neither

exhaustive nor total, because exhaustive/total information would require a Bible running

into thousands of volumes (John 21:25). Even if information were given so exhaustively,

humans would still be able to raise doubts on subjects that are not addressed there.
 

Instead of providing TOTAL information, the thrust of the Bible is to provide SUFFICIENT

information to humans. When people try to use the Bible to gain total information, they

often go into speculation and the making of hypotheses. This would obviously lead them

into all kinds of errors. Thus questions related to the salvation of infants, details about

guardian angels, details about many such subjects have to be kept within available

information. Else, the result would be error.
 

EMOTIONALISM AND DENOMINATION LOYALTIES: Emotionalism and

denominational loyalties often introduced serious biases into Bible interpretation. What

is worse, this often forces people to collect only that information from the Bible that

suits their prejudices. The rest of the statements are often ignored.
 

For example, for many Brethren people Ornaments is an emotional issue. For many

Pentecostal the subject of tongues, and for the Episcopalian church people the

hierarchical church system is a sensitive issue. Thus there is every possibility that they

would fail to collect and integrate the whole subject, because this might hurt some of

their pet interpretations.
 

Consequently, many Brethren people take up only a maximum of a dozen verses and

pretend to speak authoritatively on this subject. Most of them do not even know that

there are close to 500 references in the Bible related to ornaments, gold, silver, precious

stones, and decoration. In this way emotionalism and denominational loyalties often

hinder people from collecting and integrating information. One should not be surprised if

this gives rise to problems of interpretation.
 
Summary
 

Principles of Bible interpretations are not radically different from principles of

interpreting normal prose and poetry. (The only exception is prophecy, but that is not

our concern here). In spite of this many people manage to misinterpret the Bible. This is

due to their prejudices, problems related to perception, and due to their inability to

integrate the Biblical data.
 

Though the above three problems manifest themselves in numerous ways, an

understanding of the three basic causes would go a long way in facing problems created

by faulty Bible interpretation.